Re: Stefan Karl Part II Interview
I fail to see how those relate to me not trusting websites that fabricate information, so I'll just assume you have no idea what you are talking about. For your benifit though, I'll put this in perspective.
Say a reporter who works for a reputable newspaper is told to interview a political canidate. Either because he/she can't secure the interview, or the interview is "boring", the reporter simply makes up or adds parts to the interview and presents this as what the canidate actually said. Shouldn't this person be held accountable for their actions? Doesn't this call into question the accuracy of the reporter's previous articles?
I don't personaly have anything against ltp, I just don't like people getting away with blatent bullshit.
Yup! Spanish Inquisition! and while we're at it, a bit of McCarthyism perhaps?
Say a reporter who works for a reputable newspaper is told to interview a political canidate. Either because he/she can't secure the interview, or the interview is "boring", the reporter simply makes up or adds parts to the interview and presents this as what the canidate actually said. Shouldn't this person be held accountable for their actions? Doesn't this call into question the accuracy of the reporter's previous articles?
I don't personaly have anything against ltp, I just don't like people getting away with blatent bullshit.
Note