So, JK admits that Dumbledore is gay. She took a stand against the moviemakers when they were going to throw in references to some girl he liked in his youth.
That's all well and good, but my question? Why didn't she have the spine to have it revealed in the ACTUAL series text? She claims she doesn't care what religious nutjobs think about her series, yet turns the end of the last book into a sort of appeasing Christ metaphor, and omits this jem, which might actually have a positive residual effect on the opinions of readers.
But torture and cutting people's arms off and graphic death are a-ok.
...this reminds me of why I gave up on the HP fandom after book 3. 9_9
That's all well and good, but my question? Why didn't she have the spine to have it revealed in the ACTUAL series text? She claims she doesn't care what religious nutjobs think about her series, yet turns the end of the last book into a sort of appeasing Christ metaphor, and omits this jem, which might actually have a positive residual effect on the opinions of readers.
But torture and cutting people's arms off and graphic death are a-ok.
...this reminds me of why I gave up on the HP fandom after book 3. 9_9
Comment