Re: Jung Typology Test
Modern psychology is empirically based for the most part, but when you get into psychodynamics, Jungian psychology, and such, it's more like philosophy.
From my General Psychology university text:
"POPULAR PERSONALITY TESTS
Unscientific tests are hugely popular but only objective tests of personality are scientifically valid. Example: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Not reliable. Does not predict behavior on the job or in relationships."
Damn. Yet the article bungie posted on INFPs in childhood and adolescence described me perfectly. Could just be that I fell into a rainbow ruse, though.
Modern psychology is empirically based for the most part, but when you get into psychodynamics, Jungian psychology, and such, it's more like philosophy.
From my General Psychology university text:
"POPULAR PERSONALITY TESTS
Unscientific tests are hugely popular but only objective tests of personality are scientifically valid. Example: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Not reliable. Does not predict behavior on the job or in relationships."
Damn. Yet the article bungie posted on INFPs in childhood and adolescence described me perfectly. Could just be that I fell into a rainbow ruse, though.
Comment