Eating disorders? Let me guess, too sad to eat.
' For some reason some people don’t really blocked the bad people and let them ruin their lives until they end their lives '
IT'S ONE BUTTON!!! ONE!!! BUTTON!!!!
-
Good advice. When I was a 2nd grader, we had a new student, I greeted her first so I guess I was stuck with her until she left and for some reason even when she made weight and race comments I just shrugged it off man *facepalm* & it turns out I had my fair-share of fake friends too because most of her friends came from me good-mouthing her, luckily this tall girl told me everything about how she was using me to get morreee frrieeendds.. I should've figured that out since when the tall girl was a newbie
I was dumb okay
Luckily I have real friends nowadays!! (and tell them when they go too far because I'm not a wuss) -
I agree with your statement. As a teenager myself I had a fair share of fake friends who would non-stop vaping in my face and I always felt like I was a nobody in that group. Thankfully, I'm not apart that group anymore and I'm hanging out with few people who actually care about me. -
It goes hand in hand with the internet and now smartphones. It used to be when you came home from school you were away from all that nonsense, your family home was a refuge from bad kids at school and you didn't know or care what they were doing. Now you can check and see, and get reminders and contacts from others, 24 hours a day wherever you are. Somebody not fitting in at school can't escape it even at home, they will see people's Facebook feeds with others doing things without them (including perhaps people they thought were their friends), or they can receive online bullying. And of course there is the risk of bad adults making contact with them online.
Teenage girls in particular tend to have a strong psychological need to fit into a group of other girls and the kind of meanness that is possible via social media just was not even possible in the past. And because young people tend to live on their phones and are communicating around the clock with people, there is no escape from a bad situation, it reaches into every time and place of your life.Leave a comment:
-
Even though I might be wrong about the harmful effects of social media. It also, depends on what app (For example: Insta, snapchat, twitter and discord are the worst with bullying)Leave a comment:
-
You know what annoys me about these type of bills?
There's not one ounce of responsibility put on the parents.
Where the onus really belongs.
Case in pointWhere were you the parents?The bill, which passed 91-3, has been pushed by parents of children who died by suicide after online bullying or have otherwise been harmed by online content.Leave a comment:
-
Social media does serious damage to a lot of children, the research on it is very clear. It is particularly damaging to teenage girls. It has resulted in a lot of suicides.
When you are asking "why do politicians do something about this and not that" you have to look at it from a risk management point of view.
School shootings (or mass stabbings of children, as happened in Britain this week) are a terrible thing, but they are rare. The chances of a particular child being injured in one of these events (remember America has over 330,000,000 people) is incredibly low.
Social media on the other hand is ubiquitous, virtually every child is now exposed to it and its harmful effects.
You can't really compare the two, because you WILL be exposed to social media's effects one way or the other. Not using it is likely to get a child treated as some kind of weirdo by their peers, and they will worry about others talking about them behind their back. In contrast, you are extremely unlikely to be involved in an incident of mass violence - and those are much harder to prevent than, say, targeting a big tech corporation that has a lot to lose if they try to ignore the law.
So social media is (a) going to affect virtually every child in the country and (b) can be addressed by the law because it is targeting corporations who will comply with the law because they have a lot of money to lose. An incident of mass violence, such as the mass stabbing that just took place in Europe, is basically impossible to prevent. Typically these perpetrators have no criminal record and have never done anything that would let you restrain their actions. No law is going to prevent that kind of incident.
So you fix the stuff you can fix, especially if it will benefit tens of millions of children.
As for guns - Switzerland, in Europe, actually has gun laws which are more liberal than the US's. I think the mass shooting problem in the US is related to culture more than guns. Culture is very hard to "fix".Leave a comment:
-
Yeah I don’t why they don’t anything about it in US. Same goes for Australia when comes to knifes and e-cigarettes. Social media is not really that harmful. It depends on the way the person uses it. I grew up in the generation where Social media just started to become big and I never had problems with it (except for here and here on online games)Leave a comment:
-
It's none of my business, but don't children in the USA have other serious problems?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._by_death_tollLeave a comment:
-
The penalty appears to be a fine of $10,000 for each day the site is not in compliance. It's not so much a question of the site being shut down, so much as Pooky either complying with the law with age verification, or closing the site to US IP addresses perhaps, or even shutting down. I don't recall a bill like this before, I am not sure how it would affect international sites. It may be Europe would not allow the US to enforce it on a European site due to the privacy concerns involved in requiring age verification.
Leave a comment: